Keep the Internet Open

Re:Keep the Internet Open by wonder_er on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @05:11PM (#13871523)

I'm with you. I still feel a bit surprised at the cognitive dissonance required to support internet privacy (on one hand) and on the other, recommend having a government body regulate _the entire internet_.

I wonder if this breakdown is at least in part between populations in the USA and everyone else.

I've sat down with some pro-nn folks, honestly trying to understand how they reconcile the two, and have not made much progress.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Keep the Internet Open by ludston on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @07:39AM (#13875396)

I do not understand why there is cognitive dissonance here? NN gives users power. Privacy gives users power. There is no dissonance in wanting both of these things that have the same end.

Are you suggesting that all government regulation is a violation of user privacy? (If so, I would suggest you share a different definition of privacy to most people)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Keep the Internet Open by dragonwriter on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @03:47PM (#13879170)

> I still feel a bit surprised at the cognitive dissonance required to support internet privacy (on one hand) and on the other, recommend having a government body regulate _the entire internet_.

Supporters of Open Internet regulation do not want the government "regulating the entire internet".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Keep the Internet Open by orthecreedence on Wednesday March 15, 2017 @03:43PM (#13879135)

The government can say "all ships using a federally funded port must follow these docking procedures" without knowing what's in the ships, no?

Does the solve the cognitive dissonance issue for you?

[ Parent | on HN ]