Re:Preact: Countering the Perception That Open Source Must B...
by danjoc on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @01:20AM
(#13865214)
Sure you could. Pay for a commercial license. Corporations pay for those all the time, and usually don't even get source.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Preact: Countering the Perception That Open Source Must B...
by tracker1 on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @02:29PM
(#13870145)
And that's worked out horribly for maintainers.. it's the whole reason for open-source. Look there are plenty of use cases where (A)GPL is perfectly suitable... a front end gui framework is not a good example imho.
I've used plenty of closed source tools in the past... and they've always bit me in the ass at some point. I'd rather roll/adapt my own, or use something with a permissive license I don't have to worry about. I participate in the broader community, and prefer ISC/MIT licensing for most of what I do and use.
If it's a given database server, sure, AGPL is fine as long as the client library is permissive.