News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.K. Parliament Gives Theresa May Permission to Start Brexit by DaiPlusPlus on Monday March 13, 2017 @11:02PM (#13864618)
I'd wager many did and do care - but complacency was rife on the Remain side during the Brexit referendum - I suspect that's why Leave (and Trump) won.
Re:U.K. Parliament Gives Theresa May Permission to Start Brexit by ajmurmann on Monday March 13, 2017 @11:14PM (#13864675)
I frequently wonder why our processes of casting a vote is as simple as it is. The entire complacency issue would be resolved if the voting booths stayed open several days and we had daily counts published. I'm sure we could come up with some clever way when the vote would end. Instead we are for some reason afraid to even count more than once. I really don't get it.
Re:U.K. Parliament Gives Theresa May Permission to Start Brexit by refurb on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @12:46AM (#13865073)
I really don't get it.

Really?

In Canada they often had a ban on televising election results until after polls closed. Why? You don't want someone changing their vote because of how the polls are going.

You know, you want them to vote based on their own beliefs, not who is going to win.

Re:U.K. Parliament Gives Theresa May Permission to Start Brexit by DaiPlusPlus on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @11:20PM (#13873565)
"You don't want someone changing their vote because of how the polls are going. You know, you want them to vote based on their own beliefs, not who is going to win."

That idea makes sense in true proportional representation system, but in a first-past-the-post system then strategic-voting becomes important (as voting-for-beliefs is an immediately suboptimal strategy), and therefore if voters know who is currently in the lead and alter their voting behaviour then surely that's a good thing for democracy?

Re:U.K. Parliament Gives Theresa May Permission to Start Brexit by ajmurmann on Tuesday March 14, 2017 @05:20PM (#13871581)
Well, I might not bother voting because there is no way the Nazi party will win the election. I believe we have seen this kind of effect more than once in recent elections. What's bad if I only vote once I realize"my candidate" might actually lose?