Which, if that's the case, means that Sandstorm still is legally independent of Cloudflare, and the original Sandstorm devs can pretty much continue to do whatever they want with it. There would be some gray areas, like what will happen to future code or other IP they create for Sandstorm while employed by Cloudflare, or while using Cloudflare systems/resources; and of course their continued employment with Cloudflare may be contingent on their doing things with Sandstorm that Cloudflare likes, or at least doesn't disapprove of too strongly. But if the Sandstorm devs are just selling their future labor and not the company itself, they'll have more independence than they'd have gotten in an acqui-hire scenario.
Cap'n Proto will presumably end up with mixed copyright, but it's MIT license anyway so who cares?
CF being "cool" shouldn't put your project and its users (me!) at risk.
So in some ways better than an acquihire and in some ways worse.
Even Sandstorm not gaining traction with their B2B strategy is likely a blessing in disguise: with enterprise money coming in they would have felt a hard pull to do more things that enterprises like. No matter how much conviction you have, making payroll often trumps that.
Now, they've proven that the enterprise route doesn't work. My hope is that the project can continue to improve and gain traction to the point where it sets up or joins a foundation, then potentially try to restart a complementary commercial venture on top of that.
Well, no... I don't think we proved it didn't work, only that we lacked the expertise to make it work. With more time and some good hiring I think we could have fixed the problem, but the investor money ran out, so...
What kind of hostile commercial interest there might be, especially when the technology is protected by open-source licenses?
If there were a non-hostile commercial interest, akin to Citus in Postgres, won't it be a win for all?