Employees who decline genetic testing could face penalties under proposed bill

Re:Employees who decline genetic testing could face penaltie... by mikeash on Sunday March 12, 2017 @01:53PM (#13851947)

He was the navigator. That seems kind of important. If it wasn't, why would they bother to bring him along?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Employees who decline genetic testing could face penaltie... by rosser on Sunday March 12, 2017 @02:01PM (#13852004)

You either missed or evaded my point, simply to re-state your own. (Also: nice shadow-edit.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Employees who decline genetic testing could face penaltie... by mikeash on Sunday March 12, 2017 @02:10PM (#13852075)

I don't see where I'm evading or missing your point. Perhaps you could explain? And I didn't make any shadow edits. You sound rather paranoid.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Employees who decline genetic testing could face penaltie... by maxerickson on Sunday March 12, 2017 @02:37PM (#13852240)

Did he die during the mission? Did he really have a heart condition?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Employees who decline genetic testing could face penaltie... by mikeash on Sunday March 12, 2017 @02:42PM (#13852279)

He really had a heart condition which put him at high risk of death during the mission. That is stated in the movie. We don't know if he died during the mission, but I didn't say that, merely that it was likely.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Employees who decline genetic testing could face penaltie... by maxerickson on Sunday March 12, 2017 @02:45PM (#13852300)

I'm pretty sure that in the movie they say that the genetic tests point to a high probability of a heart condition.

It's left ambiguous as to whether he actually has a deadly heart condition.

There's the scene with the treadmill, but that can just be to show that he is normal.

[ Parent | on HN ]