News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MIT Media Lab Disobedience Award by tzs on Saturday March 11, 2017 @11:46PM (#13849031)
How was MIT complicit?

When they involved the police, they had no idea who it was that was apparently attacking them. They just knew that an unknown party was causing serious disruptions, and was actively trying to evade their countermeasures, and had moved on to trespassing and equipment tampering.

It was only after Swartz was arrested that his identity became known.

Everything after that was in the hands of prosecutors. MIT did tell prosecutors that MIT did not advocate jail time for Swartz.

Re:MIT Media Lab Disobedience Award by nikcub on Sunday March 12, 2017 @12:36AM (#13849234)
> "causing serious disruptions"

So disruptive to MIT that they didn't even notice it until JSTOR emailed.