Re:What the CIA WikiLeaks Dump Tells Us: Encryption Works
by Laforet on Saturday March 11, 2017 @10:46AM
(#13845760)
Dropbox is known to have intergration with PhotoDNA, a state program that matches file signature with a database of known illicit images. This would be impossible if the encryption used is irreversible and as far as I know dropbox never claimed otherwise.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What the CIA WikiLeaks Dump Tells Us: Encryption Works
by doubleunplussed on Saturday March 11, 2017 @09:13PM
(#13848510)
Couldn't dropbox hash the images on the client, and upload the encrypted images as well as the hash? No need to upload an unencrypted file to do matching.
Re:What the CIA WikiLeaks Dump Tells Us: Encryption Works
by eru on Sunday March 12, 2017 @09:10AM
(#13850495)
Depends on what kind of hashing they do: a scheme like yours using a cryptographic hash would be defeated by just randomly changing a single bit in the image (eg appending some garbage bytes at the end); or re-encoding the jpeg. Of course, it could still catch non-techy people.
Re:What the CIA WikiLeaks Dump Tells Us: Encryption Works
by smaddox on Saturday March 11, 2017 @10:50AM
(#13845777)
I'm not claiming it is end-to-end, nor did I expect it to be, but perhaps some people would assume that. I thought you were claiming they don't use encryption at all.
Re:What the CIA WikiLeaks Dump Tells Us: Encryption Works
by mikepurvis on Saturday March 11, 2017 @03:15PM
(#13847010)
It's effectively nothing when Dropbox themselves have access to all your files whenever they want.