Re:House Republicans would let employers demand workers’ gen...
by dragonwriter on Saturday March 11, 2017 @02:11AM
(#13844605)
> The bill blithely disclaims conflict with genetic nondiscrimination law; such disclaimer would almost certainly be held invalid if tested.
Actually, no, a later enactment explicitly stating that things it allows are not prohibited by an earlier enactment, by that explicit statement, limits the earlier enactment.
Actually, no, a later enactment explicitly stating that things it allows are not prohibited by an earlier enactment, by that explicit statement, limits the earlier enactment.