News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Women Don’t Apply for Jobs Unless They’re 100% Qualif... by rarec on Thursday March 09, 2017 @02:40PM (#13832605)
If they are so timid as to not even rise to the challenge of applying for a job with some uncertainty, how can you expect them to deal with uncertainty in the field?
Re:Why Women Don’t Apply for Jobs Unless They’re 100% Qualif... by watwut on Thursday March 09, 2017 @03:08PM (#13832983)
They assume the job requirements are real expectations. That is not uncertainity, that is taking people by their word.

I would also point out that many good programmers don't like uncertainity (notably those with asperger), it is one of few jobs where it is a good thing. Not implying they are all rock stars, just that un certainty here is red herring.

Re:Why Women Don’t Apply for Jobs Unless They’re 100% Qualif... by beowulf_cluster on Thursday March 09, 2017 @03:03PM (#13832909)
Because that's a nonsensical strawman; those things aren't even related.

Personally, I see any employer advertising for a position with stricter requirements than what they'll hire as advertising their own dishonesty. It just makes them look bad.

Re:Why Women Don’t Apply for Jobs Unless They’re 100% Qualif... by rarec on Thursday March 09, 2017 @03:31PM (#13833244)
It's mildly dishonest, but it does help you as the employer get closer to the ideal fit for the position. Especially one that is likely posted to a public forum.

The fact that candidates that pre-select themselves out of being chosen is not really a big concern. Why should it be? The way around this is knowing exactly who it is you want for the job, but in that case I wouldn't be posting the job in a public forum. It's kind of what recruiters are intended for.