News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Study: Blended food prevented hunger for longer by wavefunction on Thursday March 09, 2017 @09:47AM (#13829580)
Carbs are just more complex sugars than what we usually refer to as dietary sugar. I think the real problem is refined carbs and refined sugars, at least in my own anecdotal experience.

I don't seem to experience the same effect from eating processed carbs like pasta vs rice or potatoes.

Re:Study: Blended food prevented hunger for longer by GordonS on Friday March 10, 2017 @10:15AM (#13839169)
I have reactive hypoglycaemia, and potatoes are literally one of the worst things I can eat. I didn't realise why until I looked it up - they have a glycemic index comparable to that of table sugar!

For pasta, the glycemic index varies depending on how you cook it; al dente is better than overcooked.

Re:Study: Blended food prevented hunger for longer by marricks on Thursday March 09, 2017 @10:48AM (#13830049)
Agreed, processed bad. Guess that's why the comment on lentil and rice seemed odd to me, it's pretty great.
Re:Study: Blended food prevented hunger for longer by signal11 on Friday March 10, 2017 @02:22AM (#13836956)
Rice is way better than processed carbs, no question. I was referring to the parent's point about these meals in India -- the sheer amount of rice in the typical serving size there is okay if one was really physically active (say a farm laborer), but it's completely inappropriate for desk workers these days.

Note: white rice is actually pretty processed as well. You'd be better off sticking to brown rice (less processed, more fiber, lower glycemic index).