News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing the Invisible reCAPTCHA by michaelt on Thursday March 09, 2017 @06:39AM (#13828621)
Imagine you're at an airport and an inspector takes your batteries out of your luggage. All other things being equal, does it matter if he tosses them in the trash, or keeps them for his personal use?

From one perspective it doesn't matter - your batteries are gone either way.

But from another perspective, inspectors who keep what they find have completely different motivations - making the same outcome much more sinister and corrupt.

Re:Introducing the Invisible reCAPTCHA by arjie on Thursday March 09, 2017 @08:54AM (#13829217)
It makes sense there because the actual consequences are undesirable. What are the undesirable consequences we're incentivising here? That Google will cover the entire web in captchas?
Re:Introducing the Invisible reCAPTCHA by kuschku on Thursday March 09, 2017 @02:18PM (#13832253)
That Google gets an unfair advantage compared to other companies, making it harder to start a new company able to compete with Google on Machine Learning? (Which is already impossible, because Google uses the knowledge from ReCaptcha, GMail, etc unfairly)
Re:Introducing the Invisible reCAPTCHA by quickben on Thursday March 09, 2017 @07:51AM (#13828895)
For a more accurate money analogy: Imagine he resells them.