Re:Nevertheless, She Coded
by ruleabidinguser on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @06:38PM
(#13825077)
While you see it as a historical truth this is something that is patently false in my daily life. Sorry I don't substitute historical truth for modern truth! I don't deny the existence of sexism.
I think that is a good thing. Still, it is likely that your experience might fall in the "anecdote" category. It is a big country!
Re:Nevertheless, She Coded
by ruleabidinguser on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @06:46PM
(#13825120)
Certainly possible. Another issue I have is that I regularly see good responses to these sorts of studies linked above pointing out valid flaws and yet none-the-less I'm expected to take this issue seriously. I just don't view it as a legitimate issue, not that I'm unwilling to.
Re:Nevertheless, She Coded
by stagbeetle on Wednesday March 08, 2017 @06:00PM
(#13824783)
I ask out of curiosity. If the wage gap studies were peer reviewed and found to be false, would you accept this?
I am comfortable with my assertion that I will need to see some data before I take the position that women are not paid less than men in a discriminatory fashion. In my opinion, that women are discriminated against is a historical truth. I am not trying to be insulting, but I do find it hard to believe that people disagree on this.