Re:Republicans' new Web site not exactly what they hoped it ...
by mpf62 on Thursday May 27, 2010 @08:39AM
(#1383389)
The prohibition of minarets does not have anything to do with religious freedom. You can build as many mosques as you want and you are free to pray to anyone you like. It's only the minarets (the towers on top of the mosques) that most swiss people dislike because they just don't fit in the landscape.
Of course, this prohibition is an overreaction (there are only a handful of minarets already and building restrictions are strict in general), but I can understand that people think that "Heidiland" isn't supposed to look like ... e.g. Istanbul.
Re:Republicans' new Web site not exactly what they hoped it ...
by stcredzero on Thursday May 27, 2010 @10:30AM
(#1383688)
So "Postmodernism" is really a conservative idea?
Re:Republicans' new Web site not exactly what they hoped it ...
by mpf62 on Friday May 28, 2010 @03:44PM
(#1387445)
Probably not in general, but concerning architecture I would tend to say yes. Isn’t it an important part of “postmodern architecture” to melt premodern/traditional designs with modern ones? So, conservative ideas/values seem to have some influence.
They also have direct democracy, where any citizen can trigger a referendum if they gather enough signatures in a certain amount of time.
This sounds like a recipe for disaster, yet Switzerland has one of the most stable governments and most prosperous economies in the world. It works because they are stubbornly conservative (little-C conservative, in the sense "if it ain't broke, don't fix it") and slow to change. In general, it works for them, even if it has some anachronisms. Women only got suffrage in 1971, for example, and there's no guarantee of religious freedom (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaret_controversy_in_Switzerl...)
tl;dr - there's more than one way to run a country, and it's better to err on the side of not changing what works. But if you take this approach, you have to be mindful that just because you suppressed certain peoples' rights in the past doesn't mean you should in the future.