News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Second Age of Perl by titusd on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @05:07PM (#1381698)
I loved and openly defended Perl for years. Contrary to popular belief, I still believe that you can write large, maintainable systems in Perl. It's just that I think that you could write those same systems better in other languages.

I no longer recommend Perl as a first language to learn: I think Ruby and Python are better choices.

I no longer recommend Perl to experienced programmers: Clojure and Erlang have more to offer to the Java or C++ expert.

Perl was very important and useful for a while, but at it's root, it's a kludgy, annoying language, full of bad design choices.

I believe Perl has had it's day.

Re:The Second Age of Perl by _delirium on Wednesday May 26, 2010 @07:13PM (#1382087)
As a language to write large systems in, I agree, but I still haven't found a better shell-script-replacement language. Perl as a somewhat cleaned up superset of bash/sed/awk/grep still seems better to me than the alternatives--- when I try to write those kinds of scripts in, say, Python, it ends up feeling clunky and verbose.