Re:F# 4.1 and Visual F# Tools for Visual Studio 2017
by dualogy on Tuesday March 07, 2017 @07:11PM
(#13816578)
> It's probably possible to convince me that the limitation on circular references is actually a feature
Have that in Haskell as well. As the community largely views FP as "type-driven development" and Haskell as a "typeful language", it isn't uncommon to have a single module just for listing all the Algebraic Data Types (not their "methods" though, that's more an OOP concept anyway). Having all ADTs at a glance has its own benefits in terms of "high-level overview" etc too of course.
But of course the question was about OOP so you're right calling this a "caveat" in that respect.
Have that in Haskell as well. As the community largely views FP as "type-driven development" and Haskell as a "typeful language", it isn't uncommon to have a single module just for listing all the Algebraic Data Types (not their "methods" though, that's more an OOP concept anyway). Having all ADTs at a glance has its own benefits in terms of "high-level overview" etc too of course.
But of course the question was about OOP so you're right calling this a "caveat" in that respect.