Re:The Collapse of the Unix Philosophy
by duncan_bayne on Thursday March 09, 2017 @08:01AM
(#13828940)
Agreed almost entirely - and I apologise for uncharitably calling your reading uncharitable :)
I think there is a subtle difference between the appendix and the horse toe, though: the appendix regularly kills people due to appendicitis. I _think_ that ought to have been a clue. Unsure though as it's not really my field.
[1] http://www.thehorse.com/articles/34382/where-did-horses-extr...
[2] https://unzipyourgenes.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/unintelligen...
So I think it's entirely reasonable, in the absence of contradictory evidence, to use evolutionary thinking to make an argument that an anatomical structure seems to serve no purpose any more, just like those extra horse toes. Unfortunately, they were obviously wrong about the appendix, and I do think it's a little dangerous because the assumption of vestigiality rests upon the lack of evidence for the part having a modern use, but this can cause people to stop looking for that modern use, and then we wind up with what happened to the appendix, where it took a really long time to learn the truth because we assumed we already knew.