Re:AMA: Explaining my 750 line compiler+runtime designed to ...
by jarpineh on Monday March 06, 2017 @05:17PM
(#13806561)
Well, it seemed interesting and I suspected it would result in 42, however else it would do its work :)
Perhaps that's one way t frame the Question.
Re:AMA: Explaining my 750 line compiler+runtime designed to ...
by arcfide on Monday March 06, 2017 @07:13PM
(#13807300)
What's really interesting about the above is that it is "seeded" with a random number. :-)
Re:AMA: Explaining my 750 line compiler+runtime designed to ...
by throwaway7645 on Sunday March 05, 2017 @09:37PM
(#13800322)
+5 bad@$$ points sir.
However, if you remove the execute you can still get a string version:
42You can paste this into the REPL at TryAPL.org.