News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Men not at work: Why so many men aged 25 to 54 are not working (2016). Parent comment

Re:Men not at work: Why so many men aged 25 to 54 are not wo... by pharrington on Sunday March 05, 2017 @02:43PM (#13798085)
I replied to another commenter expressing your same view here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13798051. My comment asserts your core view is inconsistent both with apparent human sexual activity and how evolutionary pressures work.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Men not at work: Why so many men aged 25 to 54 are not wo... by 77pt77 on Sunday March 05, 2017 @03:27PM (#13798385)
> Assuming most humans having sex is not a recent development, any evolutionary pressures...

Here I think your assumption is factually wrong. DNA testing shows that it is relatively recent (very few thousands of years)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Men not at work: Why so many men aged 25 to 54 are not wo... by pharrington on Sunday March 05, 2017 @05:26PM (#13799190)
Can you link to some studies? I'm having trouble Google'ing for anything relevant :\
[ Parent | on HN ]