News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Men not at work: Why so many men aged 25 to 54 are not wo... by pm90 on Sunday March 05, 2017 @01:10PM (#13797405)
> Now...if society is breaking in a way that it's tough for men to get good jobs, then let's look at that. Women aren't to blame for that, though. Let's look at what's really going on.

I don't think the comments in this section suggested blaming women for reducing men's partipation in the workforce. Specifically, the comment's OP seems to be suggesting that while the economic tables have changed, socially it is still a requirement for men to have a regular, well paying job (or whatever that expectation is) which perhaps also need to change to accommodate the reality that a lot of men may not satisfy that requirement, while still being good partners in relationships.

Re:Men not at work: Why so many men aged 25 to 54 are not wo... by Frondo on Sunday March 05, 2017 @01:58PM (#13797779)
What I was responding to was this: "women might need to make a compromise."

Nope, if women are happy, then good for them, they certainly don't need to make a compromise. They don't owe men anything.

Re:Men not at work: Why so many men aged 25 to 54 are not wo... by madez on Sunday March 05, 2017 @04:57PM (#13798995)
The modal verb "to need" is highly depend on the context.

You might have seen it in a different context than the author. While you may have interpreted it as saying that if women don't compromise, then they are bad, the author could have meant that if women don't compromise, then (the population will decrease/whatever else that might make sense).