News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:People have no idea which sciences are robust by alganet on Sunday March 05, 2017 @10:44AM (#13796420)
People have no idea what science is
Re:People have no idea which sciences are robust by wycx on Sunday March 05, 2017 @11:43AM (#13796799)
There are many types of science: gentleman scientist science, govt. funded competitive grant science, commercial R&D science, tobacco company science...

They all have different incentives which influences how the science is conducted.

Re:People have no idea which sciences are robust by saycheese on Sunday March 05, 2017 @11:04AM (#13796516)
Okay, what is science?
Re:People have no idea which sciences are robust by alganet on Sunday March 05, 2017 @11:39AM (#13796771)
I like the definition that Carl Sagan presented on Cosmos:

> It is, so far, entirely a human invention, evolved by natural selection in the cerebral cortex for one simple reason: it works. It is not perfect. It can be misused. It is only a tool. But it is by far the best tool we have, self-correcting, ongoing, applicable to everything. It has two rules. First: there are no sacred truths; all assumptions must be critically examined; arguments from authority are worthless. Second: whatever is inconsistent with the facts must be discarded or revised.

Re:People have no idea which sciences are robust by saycheese on Sunday March 05, 2017 @05:18PM (#13799130)
Feels to me as if to you science means "Be truthful."

Am I missing something?

Re:People have no idea which sciences are robust by alganet on Sunday March 05, 2017 @05:42PM (#13799284)
It is less about truth, more about the process of trying to find it.
Re:People have no idea which sciences are robust by saycheese on Sunday March 05, 2017 @08:31PM (#13800088)
Think we agree, just semantics at this point and me trying to simplify the expression. Thanks!
Re:People have no idea which sciences are robust by SpacePotatoe on Sunday March 05, 2017 @11:12AM (#13796584)
He can't tell because he is a human