Re:Lyft Is Said to Seek New Funding as Its Rival Uber Stumbles
by ekiru on Saturday March 04, 2017 @12:17PM
(#13791816)
> but it's not impossible for hitting a pedestrian to be a non-crime because of the absence of the mental state required for any applicable crime.
Out of curiosity, under what conditions would this be the case?
Incorrect. Now, in most cases, hitting someone while driving will be at least criminally negligent and thus be some crime, but it's not impossible for hitting a pedestrian to be a non-crime because of the absence of the mental state required for any applicable crime.
> Likewise, tax fraud (intentional) is punished differently than tax negligence (unintentional).
"Negligence" is itself a mental state. That an act is illegal (though of different magnitude) when it is done through negligence as well as intentionally does not demonstrate that mental state is relevant only to degree of punishment, not legality. (There are strict liability offenses for which mental state is not relevant to legality, only possibly severity, but strict liability is exceptional in the law, particularly criminal law.)