News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Collapse of the Unix Philosophy by swolchok on Thursday March 02, 2017 @03:14PM (#13777770)
Sounds like the author needs to read Worse Is Better (https://www.jwz.org/doc/worse-is-better.html).
Re:The Collapse of the Unix Philosophy by bad_user on Thursday March 02, 2017 @03:41PM (#13777991)
The author is in fact quoting from "Worse is Better". RTFA.
Re:The Collapse of the Unix Philosophy by mundo on Thursday March 02, 2017 @03:46PM (#13778030)
^^^ Open incognito if you don't want to see jwz's NSFW salutations to HN readers...
Re:The Collapse of the Unix Philosophy by anonymoose111 on Thursday March 02, 2017 @06:58PM (#13779554)
copying the link and pasting it in a new tab is sufficient -- it's just looking at the http-referer header.
Re:The Collapse of the Unix Philosophy by haylem on Thursday March 02, 2017 @05:06PM (#13778702)
Funny that the parent was flagged, even though the link is valid, and the parent's author is not at fault.

Oh! The beauty of censorship by the masses.

Now I can see why jwz would choose to take a stab at HN. He may be right, and even too kind.

That flag is just sad...

Re:The Collapse of the Unix Philosophy by grzm on Thursday March 02, 2017 @05:12PM (#13778756)
As a sibling comment points out, the submission actually quotes from Richard Gabriel's Worse is Better. That, and the snarky tone of the comment may have been what caused people to downvote and/or flag the comment. 'swolchok could also have linked to the original, thus avoiding jwz's HN-referrer redirect.
Re:The Collapse of the Unix Philosophy by haylem on Thursday March 02, 2017 @05:25PM (#13778850)
I know all that, but if reposts or not reading articles was deserving of censorship, there'd be quite a lot of [flagged] placeholders around here.
Re:The Collapse of the Unix Philosophy by cypherpunks01 on Thursday March 02, 2017 @03:40PM (#13777984)
You might want to check that link again with a HN referer! Interesting results :)