News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sweden brings back military conscription by icambron on Thursday March 02, 2017 @01:08PM (#13776528)
Agreed that the goal is to not get invaded. That's why a country that has been recently invaded by two different countries is a poor example of someone for whom deterrence worked. Perhaps the threat of a war of attrition is an effective way to do this in general, but supporting that argument requires identifying countries for whom it worked, not a country for whom it failed spectacularly.
Re:Sweden brings back military conscription by mikeash on Thursday March 02, 2017 @01:59PM (#13777073)
Afghanistan succeeded in getting the Soviets out in the end. With the US they made the mistake of badly provoking a powerful nation. It may not be the best example, but it works.
Re:Sweden brings back military conscription by icambron on Thursday March 02, 2017 @03:46PM (#13778026)
I'm having difficulty reconciling this statement

> The goal is not to get invaded in the first place

with this one

> Afghanistan succeeded in getting the Soviets out in the end.

Re:Sweden brings back military conscription by mikeash on Thursday March 02, 2017 @04:17PM (#13778320)
The example of the Soviets losing is what would deter others. That's why I then had to explain away the US trying it not too long after.