News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sweden brings back military conscription by BurningFrog on Thursday March 02, 2017 @12:31PM (#13776086)
True.

But the cost to Afghanistan has been enormous. Four decades of constant war, millions dead, and near the lowest lifespan and living standard in the world.

Is that really the defense strategy a country should aim for ? Will a modern latte sipping atheist nation really execute it?

Also, there are many other reasons to invade countries than to hold them long term.

Re:Sweden brings back military conscription by TeMPOraL on Thursday March 02, 2017 @12:36PM (#13776154)
It does present a deterrent for the enemy who would like to invade and hold your territory. So it addresses that kind of attack. It does not address other kinds.

In a war, your losses don't usually concern your enemy. But they do care about how much it costs them to achieve their goals, so if you can make it prohibitively expensive, you have a sound defense.

Re:Sweden brings back military conscription by muninn_ on Thursday March 02, 2017 @01:19PM (#13776644)
But that's not what happened in places like Afghanistan with respect to the US. The US never wanted to "conquer" Afghanistan. If the US did want to, it could have easily killed every single person in the country and then just start building Starbucks on every corner.

The goal was to root out what they perceived as an enemy and hostile nation that harbored terrorists, and then recreate a society much more tolerant and sympathetic toward Western values. In that, there is no conquering needed. It's called nation building, and it's very different.