News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Should economists be more concerned about AI? by hwillis on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @09:51PM (#13771015)
>I think the GP's viewpoint was widely shared by "The Elite" for the past 10 years and is what created the backlash that got Trump elected.

Why do you think that? If by backlash you mean people (Trump voters) wanting social support to deal with those problems, I see zero evidence of that. The extreme anti-immigration views indicate that the opposite is true and Trump voters think people are taking advantage of social programs. When Trump talks about bringing back jobs, its purely out of xenophobia and is completely divorced from actually employing people. It's not about hiring Americans and it never was; its about not employing foreigners.

It seems to me that now more than ever the only people who care about automation affecting jobs are the ones less likely to be affected.

Re:Should economists be more concerned about AI? by WillPostForFood on Thursday March 02, 2017 @12:09AM (#13771576)
What was huge, was the perception that trade, specifically NAFTA, China, and TPP cause people to lose their jobs. The perception that the elite, and Hilary Clinton, supported those things, even when sometimes they said they didn't is what caused the backlash.
Re:Should economists be more concerned about AI? by rat87 on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @11:40PM (#13771469)
I think there is evidence that it put Trump barely over the top in critical midwestern states.