News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on New GitHub Terms of Service require removing many open-source works. Parent comment

Re:New GitHub Terms of Service require removing many open-so... by lauretas on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @03:01PM (#13767692)
> I'll move on to things like GitLab or IPFS for transmitting projects I'm working on.

Or NotABug (https://notabug.org) which is a lot more friendlier toward open source projects. IPFS sounds good, I'd love to see something P2P in this space, but nothing P2P seems to be mature enough.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:New GitHub Terms of Service require removing many open-so... by compuguy on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @03:11PM (#13767803)
Bitbucket could be an option as well.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:New GitHub Terms of Service require removing many open-so... by jwilk on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @04:17PM (#13768474)
From the article:

Atlassian Bitbucket has similar terms (even worse actually; [...])

[ Parent | on HN ]