Re:Nintendo Switch review: pure potential
by slg on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @12:22PM
(#13765839)
I'm not sure that analogy works because an unmaintained Netflix isn't a blinking eyesore like an unset digital clock. I setup Netflix on my PC and on my tablet which casts to my TV. Other devices, like my Xbox or my TV itself, are no worse for having never been setup with Netflix.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nintendo Switch review: pure potential
by btschaegg on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @02:13PM
(#13767152)
On the other hand, I am perfectly fine with a console that just plays games, because that's what I buy it for.
There were plenty consoles that came with a plethora of features but had no good games at launch - if Nintendo does it the other way around, I don't have a problem with that.
Also, if you look at it from Nintendo's perspective: If Netflix is everywhere, it certainly won't be the feature that actually sells their product.
Re:Nintendo Switch review: pure potential
by brandon272 on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @05:30PM
(#13769194)
Nintendo seems strongest when they are focusing purely on the gaming experience. Adding web browsers and Netflix because you can is just a distraction and not where their core competencies and interests are.
Re:Nintendo Switch review: pure potential
by Retric on Wednesday March 01, 2017 @02:14PM
(#13767164)
Adding UI for a Netflix account that's never setup is a waste. I would much rather they focus on something people would actually want to use.
It's the same basic problem as smart TV's. I don't care if it only adds 1$ in manufacturing costs focusing on making the best TV/console/car is much better reason to buy something than adding yet another so so entertainment features.