News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WordPress on .NET by drzaiusapelord on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @12:56PM (#13755819)
That's mostly client-side and easily avoided by not using IE/Edge. .NET uses its own library as well I believe. Not sure what the default is.

Historically, the schannel infrastructure has been secure, especially as compared to openssl.

>How is a goddamn HTTP parser in THE KERNEL more secure than a crypto/TLS library?

Because, lets face it, openssl is a shit project of legacy code no one wants to fix and https a design by committee standard no one can work well?

Re:WordPress on .NET by floatboth on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @03:26PM (#13757511)
"an attacker would have to send a specially crafted HTTP request to the affected system"

"Disable IIS kernel caching"

That's definitely not client-side at all. IIS is the thing that uses http.sys, and classic ASP.NET apps (not the new Core stuff) are usually deployed with IIS.