News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Physicist Who Denies That Dark Matter Exists by zeven7 on Monday February 27, 2017 @12:45PM (#13746114)
Part of the problem is that fixing Newton is more than just adjusting the equation; it requires making up a whole new constant, which to some is worse than making up a whole new class of matter. Constants don't have explanations; they're just like saying, "I don't know why it works out this way, it just does." It's better to have a reason that explains why something happens than to throw up your hands and say "let's just add a new constant to make things work out."
Re:A Physicist Who Denies That Dark Matter Exists by jack9 on Monday February 27, 2017 @01:29PM (#13746523)
A constant is a lot more constrained (existing in a specific context) than a class of matter that can't be observed, which is used as a hand wave to any measurement that is unexpected because not only is it not observed, it's not fully understood/constrained.
Re:A Physicist Who Denies That Dark Matter Exists by dnautics on Monday February 27, 2017 @01:45PM (#13746659)
That's not terribly convincing argument. Effectively MOND means adding a single free parameter to the model and dark matter means adding a entire continuous distribution to the model.
Re:A Physicist Who Denies That Dark Matter Exists by wnoise on Monday February 27, 2017 @04:28PM (#13748313)
A new class of matter has a whole bunch of constants -- mass, interaction coefficients, mixing angles, etc.