News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A solution for enabling UDP in the web. Parent comment

Re:A solution for enabling UDP in the web by disiplus on Monday February 27, 2017 @02:52AM (#13742619)
i think its fair what you said. webrtc offers "automatically" encrypted UDP if we are comparing like that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A solution for enabling UDP in the web by thezilch on Monday February 27, 2017 @05:26AM (#13743220)
But we already knew that. It's in the article, so again there is a story here that you're missing. We want a client/server protocol that is encrypted and simple -- not requiring ICE/STUN/TURN (OMG).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A solution for enabling UDP in the web by stcredzero on Monday February 27, 2017 @12:50PM (#13746180)
If you already have Websockets, then Simple-Peer makes it very easy to deal with WebRTC negotiation. As I've mentioned elsewhere, I've created a 4 process WebRTC UDP proxy with that running under nodejs. My use case is precisely client-server.
[ Parent | on HN ]