I'm not. I feel like human language is meant to be fluid and to evolve as we do. This would potentially lead to more of a global monoculture than we are already starting to get.
With that the whole aspect could voice translation add's another aspect to this and perhaps tackling keyboard inputs upon a keyboard layout that is designed to be the worst possible ever layout is an area due to die off sooner than we think. Though the prospect of forcing generations to endure, even if they do not know about typewriters does bemuse me.
One consequence is that almost everything you're taught about English in school is completely and totally wrong. There's the completely bogus prescriptivisms that have no grounding (e.g., thou shall not end a sentence with a preposition). But even basic things like "what are the parts of speech" are pretty much wrong, being derived primarily from "this was what this Latin scholar said 2 millennia ago about a language that has a distant linguistic relationship to English."
It's also worth pointing out that the trend to conserve spelling and the written form probably obscures the underlying grammar as it changes. The French clitic pronouns seem rather more like recently-introduced inflections to the verbs rather than clitics, and the 's of English acts rather more like a particle than a genitive case marker.
This is no change at all in what we already have. It is when we finally dedicate all tasks down to dedicated silicon that the glue of a CPU processing wise will diminish.
But then CPU's of today are constantly adapting and I'd say the C in CPU is better defined as Centralised rather than Central.
For me, I'm looking forward to a AI grammar and contextual spelling checker that will make all grama nazi's obsolete.
So my perspective upon this for intel is that I foresee no trouble for Intel, who already adapt to change and are not to be dismissed any time soon, just yet.