Re:EU taxpayers to fund $306m Google rival. No wonder the Ya...
by scw on Saturday March 15, 2008 @02:23AM
(#137412)
The $316m could accomplish much, but I doubt directly creating a startup hub. The drivers which turn cities into creative class meccas wouldn't be included, and it likely would face the same difficulties as the Middle East's education plans: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/education/11global.html
It would a powerful change if groups like Gates' (http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB120113473219511...) began investing in the efforts which have the best chance of the results they're seeking: startups. I'm guessing the startup model is antithetical to what BillsG sees as the answer, which is unfortunate.
Re:EU taxpayers to fund $306m Google rival. No wonder the Ya...
by pg on Saturday March 15, 2008 @10:58AM
(#137544)
Obviously I'd choose whatever town was most SF-like. Suppose only 1/10 of the startups lived (a very conservative assumption). Don't you think a city with 1749 startups in it would feel like a startup hub?
Re:EU taxpayers to fund $306m Google rival. No wonder the Ya...
by Tichy on Saturday March 15, 2008 @08:30AM
(#137495)
Would you (pg) scale to 17486 startups, though?
Anyway, I loathe this waste of tax money.
Maybe you wouldn't want to spend it all on seed rounds. But $306 million spent well would be enough to make a startup hub to rival Silicon Valley.