News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linus on Git and SHA-1 by grzm on Saturday February 25, 2017 @05:33PM (#13734258)
Save yourself some downvotes and remove the mention that you expect them.
Re:Linus on Git and SHA-1 by colin_fraizer on Saturday February 25, 2017 @05:37PM (#13734283)
Save myself from people proving my point? Why?
Re:Linus on Git and SHA-1 by grzm on Saturday February 25, 2017 @05:40PM (#13734295)
The HN guidelines specifically ask not to express the expectation of downvotes. You may be downvoted purely for ignoring the guidelines, regardless of the rest of your comment.

Please don't bait other users by inviting them to downvote you or proclaim that you expect to get downvoted.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Linus on Git and SHA-1 by colin_fraizer on Saturday February 25, 2017 @06:12PM (#13734443)
A generally reasonable guideline, but in this case, I am actually criticizing the tribalism that makes people rise to that bait.

It similarly leads to the discussion of how "I can't believe Linus is trying to defend SHA-1 when The Tribe already knows it is cryptographically 'bad'."

Re:Linus on Git and SHA-1 by grzm on Saturday February 25, 2017 @06:40PM (#13734600)
If you are taking the view that you're expecting downvotes to prove the point that people who are trying to uphold community standards are doing so blindly or ignorantly, you'll very likely think you're proven correct when you do receive downvotes. Can you blame them? You're explicitly flaunting the guidelines they choose to abide by while telling them they're wrong to do so in your special case.
Re:Linus on Git and SHA-1 by recursive on Sunday February 26, 2017 @12:24AM (#13735815)
ahem... "flouting"
Re:Linus on Git and SHA-1 by grzm on Sunday February 26, 2017 @12:36AM (#13735855)
You're right, of course. Thanks!