Re:Lifetimes of cryptographic hash functions
by bjornsing on Saturday February 25, 2017 @12:32PM
(#13732634)
Sure, if the claims stopped at SHA-1 being "useless" then I have no complaints. But generally the headless chicken dance tends to quickly move on to all kinds of practical exploitability; which simply isn't true.
Sure, there is broken, and then even-more broken, but SHA-1 is already, for most practical purposes, useless.