News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel Launches Atom C3000 SoCs: Up to 16 Cores for NAS, S... by revelation on Saturday February 25, 2017 @11:04AM (#13732100)
Intel Atoms are utterly useless for that. I'd wager they are useless for most anything that isn't memcpy-bound, so I wonder what makes them put 16 of them into one package.
Re:Intel Launches Atom C3000 SoCs: Up to 16 Cores for NAS, S... by lightedman on Saturday February 25, 2017 @12:12PM (#13732503)
The intel Atom C2750 keeps par with my AMD Athlon II X4 640.

Fun fact: I was running Blender in non-GPU mode on far lower hardware than that almost 15 years ago.

Re:Intel Launches Atom C3000 SoCs: Up to 16 Cores for NAS, S... by throwawayish on Saturday February 25, 2017 @01:11PM (#13732880)
Well you have up to 16 cores fighting over one 64 bit memory bus.. so this is mostly aimed at packet-processing and filer workloads I'd say.
Re:Intel Launches Atom C3000 SoCs: Up to 16 Cores for NAS, S... by imaginenore on Saturday February 25, 2017 @11:45AM (#13732317)
Per core they might be useless, but that's a lot of cores. So per dollar it might actually be good.
Re:Intel Launches Atom C3000 SoCs: Up to 16 Cores for NAS, S... by MichaelGG on Saturday February 25, 2017 @01:06PM (#13732847)
For memory-bound apps are they sort of useful? For instance, A packet forwarding system that reads a packet, does 3 main-memory lookups, then forwards or drops?
Re:Intel Launches Atom C3000 SoCs: Up to 16 Cores for NAS, S... by gonzo on Saturday February 25, 2017 @01:50PM (#13733077)
If you do it right, you don't have to the lookups in main memory.

We have a c2758 doing 12mpps l3 routing (full BGP table) with 50 ACLs on one of these: https://netgate.com/products/xg-2758-1u.html

The c3000 prototypes are due in a couple weeks.

Re:Intel Launches Atom C3000 SoCs: Up to 16 Cores for NAS, S... by snuxoll on Saturday February 25, 2017 @01:29PM (#13732981)
Now I'm wondering how one of the 16-core chips would handle VyOS...
Re:Intel Launches Atom C3000 SoCs: Up to 16 Cores for NAS, S... by gonzo on Saturday February 25, 2017 @01:51PM (#13733080)
Won't be any faster than what you have today.
Re:Intel Launches Atom C3000 SoCs: Up to 16 Cores for NAS, S... by snuxoll on Saturday February 25, 2017 @02:19PM (#13733240)
Right now I've got a little EdgeRouter X - it would probably be faster.
Re:Intel Launches Atom C3000 SoCs: Up to 16 Cores for NAS, S... by seanp2k2 on Saturday February 25, 2017 @05:26PM (#13734225)
Hard to compare against the Cavium Octeon. x86 general purpose vs MIPS64 with dedicated offload hardware...really depends on the use-case. I have an ERLite and AFAICT it competes with stuff way above it price-wise, e.g. https://store.netgate.com/ADI/RCC-VE-2440-board.aspx

I'd rather run PFSense, but it's not worth an extra $200+ for just my home use.