News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Alphabet's Waymo Alleges Uber Stole Self-Driving Secrets by tptacek on Thursday February 23, 2017 @07:42PM (#13719608)
It's evidence, but it's not dispositive, especially in cases like Cruise, where the technicality that determines the outcome might give the defense a 60/40 edge after a court case that will itself cost many millions of dollars.
Re:Alphabet's Waymo Alleges Uber Stole Self-Driving Secrets by DannyBee on Thursday February 23, 2017 @10:48PM (#13720785)
What he said. Particularly in patent and other IP cases, it's often cheaper to settle, even for a lot, than defend the lawsuit. You could say our system has failed utterly You wouldn't be wrong in that case. ....
Re:Alphabet's Waymo Alleges Uber Stole Self-Driving Secrets by tptacek on Friday February 24, 2017 @12:20AM (#13721234)
I've never been in a situation anything like Cruise, but I've been a founder in an acquisition that went to legal over absent cofounders --- actually, come to think of it, twice, once with me the absent cofounder and once not --- and: I can't imagine any of these cases ever not settling.

Even with no tenable claim at all, the absent cofounder has a gun to your head: a proposed liquidation that pends on a civil suit simply isn't going to close. There are time limits on all of this stuff, and the acquirer is simply going to say "fuck it" and walk if they can't predict when the deal will close. A detail I think people who've never sold a company don't realize is that the legal costs for both sides of a deal that closes uneventfully can get close to 7 figures.

I guess this is valuable information for startup founders. It's also a reason you should run, not walk, from any early-stage business partner that wants to negotiate or complexify vesting. 1 year cliff, 4+ year vest, the way everyone does it, or go start a different company.