Re:Docker in Production: An Update
by merb on Thursday February 23, 2017 @11:56AM
(#13715397)
the problem is, that the docker (community) or rather the company behind it, focuses on too much, instead of just doing one thing and doing it great.
no they need to reimplement the world and create their own kubernetes (or some sort of it).
their new website is less accessible as it was in the old version, etc...
and all the new projects and people.
and the various ways to configure docker. why does a simple container engine needs to have so many parameters to configure it?
the network experience is still not as good as it could be and docker is still way more complicated to setup than a simple aws and some AWS AMIs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I'd like to see Rkt/Coreos folks start showing how their stuff IS accessible than keep spewing this flamewar crap on HN. I've had nothing but excellent comments from the Kube developers, but every time a Rkt dev or fan comes on here, this is the crap we get.
Re:Docker in Production: An Update
by jzelinskie on Thursday February 23, 2017 @06:51PM
(#13719150)
I think you might be conflating pot stirrers with actual rkt devs. CoreOS (along with many other companies) are the Kubernetes developers.
FWIW, there was drama with the initial rkt announcement, but we've actually seen docker adopt most of the original criticisms and that should be applauded for both CoreOS and Docker.