Re:Putting x264 developer's technical analysis of WebM into ...
by famrey on Saturday May 22, 2010 @09:25AM
(#1370263)
It's a good codec. But as you can see, the specification was clearly not finished. So On2 sold a codec package that wasn't very polished. Doesn't mean it wasn't worth the money. It just means that polish needs to be applied, and now that it's open, it will.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.