News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Putting x264 developer's technical analysis of WebM into ... by famrey on Saturday May 22, 2010 @09:25AM (#1370263)
It's a good codec. But as you can see, the specification was clearly not finished. So On2 sold a codec package that wasn't very polished. Doesn't mean it wasn't worth the money. It just means that polish needs to be applied, and now that it's open, it will.

There are no comments on this comment yet.