Re:PuTTY 0.68 has been released
by xs on Tuesday February 21, 2017 @07:00PM
(#13701489)
Why would such a small, simple program need to be 64 bit? Exactly what changes when moving puTTY from 32 bit to 64 bit? It now takes up more memory?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
We are well beyond moving to 64bit on a needs-only basis. At this point it's about dropping legacy and future proofing. There's also no reason 64bit apps should have a larger memory footprint; the ISA and addressing modes are actually much tidier.
Re:PuTTY 0.68 has been released
by executesorder66 on Wednesday February 22, 2017 @12:39AM
(#13703301)
Here are the reasons they now provide a 64bit version: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/w...
The most likely reason is ASLR support, since you have more address space available for randomisation. Other than that, you can probably get a slight boost in performance from the differences between x64 and x86, but lose out if the code is particularly pointer-heavy.