News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PuTTY 0.68 has been released by xs on Tuesday February 21, 2017 @07:00PM (#13701489)
Why would such a small, simple program need to be 64 bit? Exactly what changes when moving puTTY from 32 bit to 64 bit? It now takes up more memory?
Re:PuTTY 0.68 has been released by gfody on Tuesday February 21, 2017 @08:40PM (#13702139)
We are well beyond moving to 64bit on a needs-only basis. At this point it's about dropping legacy and future proofing. There's also no reason 64bit apps should have a larger memory footprint; the ISA and addressing modes are actually much tidier.
Re:PuTTY 0.68 has been released by executesorder66 on Wednesday February 22, 2017 @12:39AM (#13703301)
Here are the reasons they now provide a 64bit version: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/w...
Re:PuTTY 0.68 has been released by rb12345 on Tuesday February 21, 2017 @07:53PM (#13701863)
The most likely reason is ASLR support, since you have more address space available for randomisation. Other than that, you can probably get a slight boost in performance from the differences between x64 and x86, but lose out if the code is particularly pointer-heavy.