Re:Signal can now be used without Google Play Services
by colordrops on Monday February 20, 2017 @08:00PM
(#13692405)
Discovery and preventing spam should not take precedence over privacy for an app that supposedly has privacy as its number one priority.
Re:Signal can now be used without Google Play Services
by SimonPStevens on Tuesday February 21, 2017 @06:27AM
(#13694804)
Privacy isn't signal's one priority.
Good enough privacy for the masses is.
They are always making these tradeoffs, and always make the same decisions. Perfect privacy in every situation isn't the goal. The goal is better privacy than the average person currently has, while still maintaining a level of convenience that the average user well accept.
Re:Signal can now be used without Google Play Services
by colordrops on Tuesday February 21, 2017 @08:43AM
(#13695307)
That's what google and Facebook say.
Re:Signal can now be used without Google Play Services
by mirimir on Monday February 20, 2017 @10:09PM
(#13692939)
Indeed. So one must conclude that privacy isn't the top priority.
Re:Signal can now be used without Google Play Services
by yorwba on Monday February 20, 2017 @07:27PM
(#13692236)
Why is it is easier to find someone when you can only use one identifier to find them, instead of several? Note that WeChat also uses phone numbers to limit spam, so you can find anyone if you know their number. (But exchanging QR codes is the preferred method of sharing contact information, to the point where I couldn't call most of my contacts except through WeChat.)
To prevent spam and promote discovery. Finding someone on WhatsApp or Signal is easier than on WeChat as with the latter someone might be using a screen name, or an email address or a phone number.