Re:Cmd/compile: Go 1.8 regression: sync/atomic loop elided
by gpderetta on Monday February 20, 2017 @01:00PM
(#13689379)
Did you reply to the wrong post? My post was only about ordering.
Still the C++ spec has wording about making stores visible in a reasonable time. The wording is non-normative as they run out of time (ah!) while trying to come up with a more formal (and implementable) specification.
edit: oh, I see I wrote 'default visibility' instead of 'default ordering'.
Still the C++ spec has wording about making stores visible in a reasonable time. The wording is non-normative as they run out of time (ah!) while trying to come up with a more formal (and implementable) specification.
edit: oh, I see I wrote 'default visibility' instead of 'default ordering'.