AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Benchmarked – Giving Intel’s $1000 Chips A Run For It

Re:AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Benchmarked – Giving Intel’s $1000 Chip... by guitarbill on Sunday February 19, 2017 @04:45AM (#13678944)

IDK, I've seen some odd RAM failure modes where the base OS would run fine, but then depending on the load (e.g. games) some weird stuff would happen like a BSOD after exactly <x> minutes of gameplay.

Once ZFS writes corrupted metadata with corrupted checksums to the disk, it's very hard to recover that data. Yes, ZFS is not backup, but the implications of serving clients messed up data is also worrying in certain business cases.

Given that ECC RAM isn't (much?) more expensive, why not just use ECC? (For my microserver I remember it being the same price as non-ECC.) Well, because CPUs with ECC support are rare, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Benchmarked – Giving Intel’s $1000 Chip... by mioelnir on Sunday February 19, 2017 @09:35AM (#13679891)

Once any filesystem writes data that was corrupted in memory, the data is hard to recover. And any filesystem will serve this corrupted data if asked, since it is all that it has. This is not a ZFS specific failure mode.

Without ECC, ZFS loses one of the guarantees that it otherwise provides. But it only degrades down to how bad every filesystem is in the face of memory corruption - not worse.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Benchmarked – Giving Intel’s $1000 Chip... by boomboomsubban on Sunday February 19, 2017 @05:23AM (#13679054)

The RAM itself isn't much more expensive, it's a compatible motherboard and CPU that add to the price. If you can't afford even a temporary loss of data it's well worth the cost. That is true with whatever filesystem you choose, and ZFS is always a great choice.

[ Parent | on HN ]