Re:AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Benchmarked – Giving Intel’s $1000 Chip...
by yuhong on Sunday February 19, 2017 @04:27AM
(#13678886)
Look at Xeon E3, for example:
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E1681911...
Re:AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Benchmarked – Giving Intel’s $1000 Chip...
by lultimouomo on Sunday February 19, 2017 @08:39AM
(#13679610)
Thanks. It looks there are reasonably priced mini-ITX boards that support Skylake Xeons (a note to this that are considering this: v5 E3 (Skylake) use the same socket as Cores, but need a different chipset).
The 80W TDP worries me about though, cooling, noise and money/pollution wise (the extra 45W make around 400kWh/year).
Considering the CPU will be idle most of the time, do you have figures about the actual idle consumption of an E3 based machine?
Re:AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Benchmarked – Giving Intel’s $1000 Chip...
by yuhong on Sunday February 19, 2017 @11:05PM
(#13684209)
There are also lower TDP models like http://ark.intel.com/products/53401/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E3-...
Re:AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Benchmarked – Giving Intel’s $1000 Chip...
by wtallis on Sunday February 19, 2017 @02:31PM
(#13681444)
My home server with a Xeon E3 1240v5, 5 3.5" hard drives, one SSD, a SAS HBA and a small discrete GPU idles at 71W as reported by my UPS. I haven't made any special effort to optimize power consumption yet.
For way less, if you're willing to five up on ECC, you can get an i5-7500T and a pretty good motherboard, bringing your TDP to 35W but having a passmark of 7055, and most importantly, a single thread rating of 1924.
This might not matter much if you're use is exclusively NAS, but I will probably end up running some virtualized or containerized server, or streaming video possibly transcoding on the fly, and I'm afraid the Atom might become a bottleneck.
Is there a solution that is somewhat competitive with the i3/5/7 on price and power, and has ECC? And, ideally, that comes in a Mini-ITX form factor?
[0] Obviously the PassMark score is only a ballpark estimate to get an idea of how fast is a chip, but still.