Dole Food Had Too Many Shares

Re:Dole Food Had Too Many Shares by drewkett on Friday February 17, 2017 @02:30PM (#13670981)

Taking a company private is when a company buys back all the publicly traded shares, so that one can no longer purchase shares in the company on a publicly traded market. Usually a company doesn't have enough cash to accomplish this, so they take on additional debt or outside investment to afford buying all of the publicly available shares.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dole Food Had Too Many Shares by kgwgk on Friday February 17, 2017 @03:01PM (#13671225)

> Taking a company private is when a company buys back all the publicly traded shares,

That is not correct, unless the second company is different from the first.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dole Food Had Too Many Shares by Kiro on Friday February 17, 2017 @02:39PM (#13671051)

Thanks. So why didn't it happen at market price? How do you set a price if the shares are public?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dole Food Had Too Many Shares by bertjk on Friday February 17, 2017 @03:03PM (#13671239)

The price is typically set at a premium over the market price in order to persuade existing shareholders to tender their shares to you.

As for what happens to holdouts that e.g. do not think the price is high enough, their situation is explained by: http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/06/rejecttenderoffer...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dole Food Had Too Many Shares by kgwgk on Friday February 17, 2017 @03:05PM (#13671260)

You set a price high enough and make an offer to all the shareholders, who might or might not want to sell to you at that price. And then there are complex rules about how many of them have to accept and what happens to those who didn't want to sell.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dole Food Had Too Many Shares by refurb on Friday February 17, 2017 @04:36PM (#13671905)

There are usually shareholder agreements in place that not every single shareholder has to agree to a acquisition. Otherwise, you'd never be able to acquire a company if just one shareholder, holding one unit of stock said "no".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dole Food Had Too Many Shares by ptaipale on Saturday February 18, 2017 @01:03PM (#13675822)

I think in most jurisdictions there is a law that enables a supermajority shareholder to take possession by a forced buy-out of remaining stock, at a "fair price". Thus a separate shareholder agreement is not necessarily required.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dole Food Had Too Many Shares by moftz on Friday February 17, 2017 @03:34PM (#13671478)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dole Food Had Too Many Shares by kgwgk on Friday February 17, 2017 @04:59PM (#13672056)

This comment makes no sense at all. Dole didn't offered anything! In case someone may be getting confused about the process: Murdock (who happened to be Dole's chairman and CEO) offered $12 in June (when the stock was trading at $10.20) for the shares he didn't control already. He raised his offer to $13.50 in August.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dole Food Had Too Many Shares by r00fus on Friday February 17, 2017 @03:12PM (#13671311)

Is this then the logical/extreme conclusion of share buybacks programs?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dole Food Had Too Many Shares by ptaipale on Friday February 17, 2017 @04:39PM (#13671927)

No. That was a misunderstanding. Share buyback is just an alternative to paying out dividends.

[ Parent | on HN ]