News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS released by tehwalrus on Friday February 17, 2017 @06:46AM (#13667553)
Do you have a link to a blog post about your setup? If not, would you consider writing about it?
Re:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS released by pawadu on Friday February 17, 2017 @07:47AM (#13667872)
I am also interested in this!

It would also be great to see some audio latency numbers for ubuntu vs the rest on common hardware

Re:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS released by Crespyl on Friday February 17, 2017 @04:27PM (#13671833)
IIRC Ubuntu Studio (and most (all?) professional linux audio systems) uses JACK rather than ASLA/Pulse like most other versions of Ubuntu.

JACK has a reputation for being fiddly to set up, but puts great emphasis on low-latency/real-time and other professional use-cases. I'd expect it to be competitive, but don't really have the knowledge to make the comparisons myself.

I did find this unfinished review of latency in JACK from a few years ago: http://apps.linuxaudio.org/wiki/jack_latency_tests#does_late...

Re:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS released by Cephlin on Friday February 17, 2017 @11:01AM (#13669142)
I also would like to know your setup! I'd be very interested!

I was looking into whether I should purchase Windows or buy a Mac to run a DAW, but if you're saying that Ardour is good enough, then I can just install that this weekend!

Re:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS released by mmjaa on Monday February 20, 2017 @03:54AM (#13685616)
Just do it! BUT! Commit to using JACK for everything, and get rid of PulseAudio.