News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft’s February security update release delayed to M... by notalaser on Thursday February 16, 2017 @04:19AM (#13658624)
Like I said, it's not entirely impossible (a while ago I was using checkrestart on my Debian machine with pretty good results), but the result is still somewhat clunky. There are a lot of things that aren't so easily checked: changes in interpreted code (needrestart can, fortunately, deal with Java, Perl, Python and Ruby, but I don't know how well, and there's no shortage of packages that rely on old-fashioned bash scripts or -- hey, Polkit! -- JavaScript), changes in configuration files and so on.

This is a reasonable solution if you're running relatively non-critical processes on a single machine. If you really want to avoid downtime, a cluster with rolling updates seems like a solution with far fewer headaches.

Non-critical covers a lot these days, fortunately :-).

Re:Microsoft’s February security update release delayed to M... by throwawayish on Thursday February 16, 2017 @07:09AM (#13659260)
Yes, clustering and virtualizing things is pretty much how this has been handled at a scale, be it modern web applications, (Open)VMS or mainframes. It's simpler and has other advantages to architect the application for this than to do the custom integration work required to make it work on a process/application level.
Re:Microsoft’s February security update release delayed to M... by notalaser on Thursday February 16, 2017 @01:18PM (#13662189)
> (Open)VMS

It'll eventually get reinvented :-).