News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Top Hat Raises $22M to Go After Pearson, McGraw-Hill. Parent comment

Re:Top Hat Raises $22M to Go After Pearson, McGraw-Hill by yannickt on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @11:22AM (#13653093)
It's one thing to prioritize a candidate with a public profile over one without when determining the order in which to interview candidates.

But to reject a candidate, after he's interviewed by the CEO (so this would presumably be the last interview stage), because he doesn't have "enough" public projects and therefore doesn't "love the web" enough? I think that's stupid.

Edit: misread the parent, we are actually saying the same thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Top Hat Raises $22M to Go After Pearson, McGraw-Hill by latch on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @11:28AM (#13653152)
which is what I said.
[ Parent | on HN ]