Re:'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
by rms on Thursday May 20, 2010 @03:47PM
(#1365082)
Or http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/328/5981/958
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
by raimondious on Thursday May 20, 2010 @03:58PM
(#1365122)
My favorite part from that article:
So that the assembled genome would be recognizable as synthetic, four of the ordered DNA sequences contained strings of bases that, in code, spell out an e-mail address, the names of many of the people involved in the project, and a few famous quotations.
Re:'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
by Evgeny on Thursday May 20, 2010 @06:57PM
(#1365770)
I guess sooner or later the random mutations may make these string "corrupted".
Re:'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
by Devilboy on Thursday May 20, 2010 @08:14PM
(#1365943)
I hope they included checkbits!
Re:'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
by zackattack on Thursday May 20, 2010 @09:56PM
(#1366117)
it may be a misconception but i think that checkbits are a feature of organic dna?
Re:'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists
by biotech on Thursday May 20, 2010 @11:38PM
(#1366301)
Yep! There is some error-checking built into dna-replication. The protein that does the replication is called DNA Polymerase. From its wikipedia article:
Error correction is a property of some, but not all, DNA polymerases. This process corrects mistakes in newly-synthesized DNA. When an incorrect base pair is recognized, DNA polymerase reverses its direction by one base pair of DNA. The 3'-5' exonuclease activity of the enzyme allows the incorrect base pair to be excised (this activity is known as proofreading). Following base excision, the polymerase can re-insert the correct base and replication can continue.