Usually I agree with the moderating, but ...

Re:Usually I agree with the moderating, but ... by tome on Thursday May 20, 2010 @03:02PM (#1364939)

I flagged it. It can barely be described as a paradox, and the question itself didn't contain any useful analysis. It's a shame if insightful comments there didn't get the attention they deserved, but they weren't there at the time I flagged it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Usually I agree with the moderating, but ... by gaulinmp on Thursday May 20, 2010 @03:23PM (#1365007)

Barely be described as a paradox? What does this even mean? Is the state of paradox not binary? As was stated it could lead to great discussions, the foremost of which in my mind would pertain to GEB and fans thereof. It was a Socratic approach to initiating discussion, and in your mind this warrants flagging?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Usually I agree with the moderating, but ... by JoeAltmaier on Thursday May 20, 2010 @03:30PM (#1365034)

It was a whimsical observation; a welcome break to my day. To censor that post was cynical, anal retentive and a total waste of a mouse click on the part of the censor. Shame on them!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Usually I agree with the moderating, but ... by metamemetics on Thursday May 20, 2010 @04:02PM (#1365137)

It would have made more sense if you started by treating the subject line as a given proposition assumed to be true.

[ Parent | on HN ]