Re:Watching Wikipedia's extinction event from a distance
by mmphosis on Tuesday February 14, 2017 @01:34PM
(#13645875)
The concrete examples have been deleted.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Watching Wikipedia's extinction event from a distance
by TeMPOraL on Tuesday February 14, 2017 @02:00PM
(#13646100)
Which means things work as they're supposed to, doesn't it?
Re:Watching Wikipedia's extinction event from a distance
by TuringTest on Tuesday February 28, 2017 @08:56AM
(#13753737)
The "consoles generations" articles have certainly not been fixed.
Re:Watching Wikipedia's extinction event from a distance
by PDoyle on Wednesday February 15, 2017 @07:43AM
(#13651582)
No, obviously it does not mean that. That known flaws have been fixed says nothing about the prevalence of unknown flaws.
Re:Watching Wikipedia's extinction event from a distance
by macobo on Tuesday February 14, 2017 @03:18PM
(#13646733)
But you just said this:
> I've looked at large articles I contributed to a few years ago and they are now disasters.
Examples would be welcome.
Re:Watching Wikipedia's extinction event from a distance
by maxerickson on Tuesday February 14, 2017 @03:23PM
(#13646779)
I think mmphosis was being tongue in cheek given the article being discussed.
In any case, they didn't make the claim about disaster articles.